No, that just means someone has yet to prove it It's called luck, someone stated that any AI has a 50-50 chance of choosing the right path, just like people. Well if there's two paths anyway. Unproven assumption just means that it has been proved yet That's my thoughts anyway…
I like it! What was this made on? It doesn't look photoshop-like to me but im wrong about a lot of things!
WOW I just noticed something, if you tilt your screen backwards the first image looks darker (naturally, but just try it) and it looks pretty cool!
Jim, I prefer the ones you make, no offense too anyone else, and i was wondering if theres a reason you're not doing them? anyway, please get back to me and if you could will you tell me roughly when you're gonna start doin them again
Read the blog entry about him being on vacation. If you go to http://www.reclaimercomic.com and look UNDER where the comic is, it's right there. I only post the link to the main page because for all I know he followed another link or used the RSS feed to read it.
Such a picture could be made in photoshop, circular gradiants wouldn't be too hard, make a circle, add a border gradient under properties for a layer that's the shape of a circle, then duplicate that layer but make the next circle bigger.
At least, in Gimp it would be easy.
LOL, Nice comic, though completely random
I'm highly impressed with this one, though the ending needs a lot of work.
Unproven Assumption, another cavalcade perhaps
No, that just means someone has yet to prove it
It's called luck, someone stated that any AI has a 50-50 chance of choosing the right path, just like people. Well if there's two paths anyway. Unproven assumption just means that it has been proved yet 
That's my thoughts anyway…
In reality, just about anything has a 50% chance of failure. We just have the illusion that the likable result will happen over the failure.
It all has to do with luck and skill in that case.
I'm fairly sure Murphy would dissagree with that statement.
Damn you Murphy, DAMN YOU!!
Not… actually true. It's way more complicated than that.
I like it! What was this made on? It doesn't look photoshop-like to me but im wrong about a lot of things!
WOW I just noticed something, if you tilt your screen backwards the first image looks darker (naturally, but just try it) and it looks pretty cool!
Hey that's pretty cool
If I were to guess, it may have been made on GiMP.
I use GIMP and my stuff looks MUCH different than this…
LaTeX
Jim, I prefer the ones you make, no offense too anyone else, and i was wondering if theres a reason you're not doing them? anyway, please get back to me and if you could will you tell me roughly when you're gonna start doin them again
Read the blog entry about him being on vacation. If you go to http://www.reclaimercomic.com and look UNDER where the comic is, it's right there. I only post the link to the main page because for all I know he followed another link or used the RSS feed to read it.
I am sooooooooooooooo confused right now.
To borrow from Rooster Teeth…
Less Plot, More Stupid.™
I don't recall this in any videos…
aww, thanks, i was wonderin
psychadelic background images…
I can easily Tell. It was Made On PowerPoint. On no other program would people resort to such psychedelic gradient's.
Actually, I'm about 99.999999% sure that it was made using LaTeX. The truly geeky among us will appreciate the beauty of this.
i consider myself extreamly "geeky", but such an occasion would hardly make me appreciate any beauty that may or may not be in it.
Well….It SEEMS like somthing that would be made in powerpoint…...anyway…...
runs away and hides behind a rock
Such a picture could be made in photoshop, circular gradiants wouldn't be too hard, make a circle, add a border gradient under properties for a layer that's the shape of a circle, then duplicate that layer but make the next circle bigger.
At least, in Gimp it would be easy.
That's because every artist paints with different styles.